|
|
Debate
Aug 23, 2016 2:44:03 GMT
Post by Louise on Aug 23, 2016 2:44:03 GMT
Resolve that the "No money, no care" policy of private hospitals is morally acceptable.
|
|
|
|
Debate
Aug 23, 2016 2:46:45 GMT
Post by byra on Aug 23, 2016 2:46:45 GMT
asdfghjkl
|
|
|
|
Debate
Aug 23, 2016 2:51:17 GMT
Post by Louise on Aug 23, 2016 2:51:17 GMT
Quick question: Are we going to touch on Libertarianism and Socialism and whatevs?
Big question: What are the main grounds of our debate? Rights, moralism, morality?
|
|
|
|
Debate
Aug 23, 2016 3:03:38 GMT
Post by Louise on Aug 23, 2016 3:03:38 GMT
All rights are equal. Argument against Universal Human Rights Article 25, - States have the responsibility to guarantee their citizens the right to adequate health. When for whatever reason they are unable to do so, the international community must assume that responsibility. - States have the responsibility to ensure that none of their citizens are deprived of this right by state action. - These rights are guaranteed to all citizens, regardless of race, religion, gender, age, or social standing in the community, or other status. What do you think? Reference: hrlibrary.umn.edu/edumat/studyguides/righttohealth.html |
|
